Search Results for performance rights act

Blog: Performance Rights Act Passes in Senate Judiciary Committee

Today, (Oct 15, 2009), the Senate Judiciary Committee passed their version of the Performance Rights Act of 2009 in voice vote. This is an important step in ensuring that performers and sound copyright owners (usually the labels) are compensated when their music is played (or “performed”) on over-the-air radio.

Currently, when you hear a song on over-the-air broadcast radio in the US, the composer/songwriter/publisher are compensated for that “public performance” via ASCAP/BMI/SESAC, but the performer and record label are not. Meaning, if you hear Aretha Franklin’s classic version of “Respect” on the radio, the songwriter (in this case, Otis Redding’s estate) and the publisher receive payment; the Queen of Soul (and her label) do not receive any performance royalties. Nearly every other industrialized nation compensates songwriters and performers for the over-air broadcast of their work — notable exceptions include Iran and North Korea. read more

Press Mention: Royalty Bills Include Exceptions

Patrick Leahy says that the performance royalty he and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) are pushing will have minimal affect on most radio operators in the US. In fact, over 75% will be capped at a maximum $5K blanket license as long as they stay under revenue benchmarks. And non-profits will be capped at $1K. …We suspect that groups like AFTRA, the American Federation of Musicians, the Future of Music Coalition, musicFirst and other such organizations will eagerly endorse this clause. But RIAA’s support will no doubt disappear faster than an Eddie Van Halen guitar lick
Add to calendar
Syndicate content