Search Results for Copyright Royalty Board

Blog: Webcasting Royalty rates: Deal or No Deal?

Back in September 2008, we told you about the passing of the Webcaster Settlement Act, which allowed for the implementation of an agreement between copyright owners, performers and online broadcasters on webcasting royalty rates — provided they arrive at mutually-agreed-upon rates by February 15, 2009. read more

Blog: Audio Ads on Pandora

You might have run across the handful of articles in the last day or so about online “predictive” radio service Pandora adding audio ads. This move is no doubt an attempt to develop a sustainable revenue stream for Pandora’s free services (the company also offers yearly ad-free subscriptions for $36).

We at FMC are big Pandora fans, and we know we’re not alone. It’s a good bet that the service’s regular users will continue to support it, largely due to Pandora’s easy-to-use and highly addictive architecture that allows listeners to customize any number of “radio stations” based on their musical preferences. But we’ll have to wait and see. read more

Press Mention: CRB Day 2: Industry Reaction

The music industry reacted favorably to the Copyright Royalty Board’s release Thursday of new mechanical royalty rates. The CRB left unchanged the per-song rate of 9.1 cents for physical product, set for the first time a statutory rate for permanent downloads of 9.1 cents (the same as the prevailing industry standard rate) and established a 24 cent rate for mastertone ringtones (mastertone royalty rates were previously negotiated and typically equaled about 10% of the retail price). A statement from Future of Music Coalition: “Future of Music Coalition is encouraged that the parties involved in the proceedings seem pleased with the decision, and looks forward to reading the entire CRB decision when it is made public.

Blog: (Web)Casting Call, Round II

On September 23, songwriters, publishers, record labels and digital music services announced they had reached an agreement on mechanical royalties for songs played on online music services.

Called a “breakthrough that will facilitate new ways to offer music to consumers online,” the voluntary agreement crafted by the Digital Media Association (DiMA), the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA), the RIAA, the Nashville Songwriters Association International (NSAI) and the Songwriters Guild of America (SGA) ended a longstanding dispute about mechanical royalties for interactive streaming and limited downloads. read more

Blog: (Web)Casting Call

FMC has been following the back-and-forth about webcasting royalty rates almost as long as webcasting has existed. We’ve always recognized the value of smaller online broadcasters to the online music world — their passion and energy mean an awful lot of music that would otherwise have no outlet can reach ears around the world. We also support the continued development of larger webcast services, particularly the ones with innovative technology that conforms to your personal taste, like Pandora. On the other hand, we believe that artists should be fairly compensated for their work, and that the success of new technologies can’t come at the expense of creators’ interests. read more

Blog: SoundExchange reaches agreement with some large webcasters

The Cold War between SoundExchange and webcasters over the new royalty rates is thawing — at least in part. SoundExchange announced yesterday it had reached a compromise with some large webcasters that will give them a break on the rates set by the Copyright Royalty Board back in March.

The CRB had required webcasters to pay a minimum $500 "per station per channel" fee with no cap. This would add up to a hefty chunk of change for webcasters (such as Pandora) that allow each listener to create a persona web channel. Under the terms of the compromise, each webcasters’ royalty rates will be capped at $50,000 regardless of the number of stations or channels. read more

Filing: FMC Testimony Submitted to House Small Business Committee on Webcasting Rates

House Committee on Small Business
2361 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairwoman Velázquez:

Future of Music Coalition respectfully submits this written testimony for consideration in advance of the committee’s June 28, 2007 hearing on “Assessing the Impact of the Copyright Royalty Board Decision to Increase Royalty Rates on Recording Artists and Webcasters”. read more

Blog: A brief history of copyright

Kurt Hanson over at Radio and Internet Newsletter offers an excellent (and expansive) rundown on the history of copyright law leading up to the recent decision by the Copyright Royalty Board to set higher royalty rates for webcasting. The history is to long to quote, but Hanson rightly diagnoses (with one major caveat) the problem with the ruling:

"And thus we end up with a situation in we’re in right now, in which a trio of judges granted the copyright owners a royalty rate from Internet radio that is effectively, I believe, more than 100% of the total industry’s revenues!… read more

Filing: FMC Reply Comments to the Copyright Office on Webcasting Recordkeeping

VIA HAND DELIVERY
Office of the General Counsel
Copyright Office
James Madison Building, Room LM-403
First and Independence Avenue, SE
Washington, DC

RE: Notice and Recordkeeping for Use of Sound Recordings Under Statutory License, 37 CFR Part 201

Reply Comments
read more

Article: The Webcasting/CARP Fact Sheet

Apr 25 2002

A Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel is a group of three arbitrators from the private sector, appointed and administered by the US Copyright Office and the Library of Congress, which meet for limited times for the purpose of adjusting rates and distributing royalties. A CARP was established in 1993 to negotiate the terms of the webcasting royalty rates and reporting requirements. This fact sheet covered some of the core issues that were present in the proceedings in 2001-2002. read more

Add to calendar
Syndicate content