|
|
|
Broad Artist Coalition sends Statement
to FCC and Congress on Current Issues in Radio
|
|
American Federation of Musicians (AFM) |
Music Managers Forum (MMF) |
JOINT STATEMENT ON CURRENT ISSUES IN RADIO
October 8, 2003
Update to May 2002
Statement on Issues in Radio
In May 2002, a broad coalition of music industry and advocacy groups released
a Statement on Current Issues in Radio. This update to that statement
is signed by key organizations that represent musicians, singers, retailers
and performing artists.
Although we are pleased that the issue of media consolidation is receiving
national attention, we are concerned that many of the problems caused
or exacerbated by radio consolidation have yet to be resolved. We therefore
collectively reiterate our call on the Federal Communications Commission
and Congress to ensure that radio serves the public interest. In this
document we revisit our positions on vertical integration of radio ownership,
payola, radio ownership consolidation and low power radio.
Vertical Integration of Radio Ownership with other
Entertainment and Media Enterprises
The leverage and control exerted by radio group owners
that are also vertically integrated companies has continued to increase.
Pollstar’s Online 2003 Mid-Year Top 50 Promoters chart shows that
Clear Channel Entertainment has sold more total tickets than promoters
numbered 2 through 30 combined[2]. Clear Channel
continues to have a direct economic interest in promoting its own concerts
and tours on its numerous radio stations. It also has an interest in limiting
the promotional support of bands and artists who are performing for non-Clear
Channel companies, at non-Clear Channel venues or under the sponsorship
of non-Clear Channel stations.
Once again, we call on the FCC to investigate whether an artist's choice
to play or not to play certain venues or to use or not to use a certain
promotion company impacts that artist's position on or removal from radio
station group play lists. We also call on the FCC and Congress to protect
artists from being required or pressured to do free concerts or concerts
at less than market rates at any venues owned by a radio station licensee
in order to protect or enhance their ability to receive airplay of their
music. We also request that the FCC and Congress protect an artist's right
to negotiate fairly with companies like Ticketmaster that dominate the
market and have exclusive contracts with the majority of performance venues.
Payola
Our May 2002 Statement called attention to de facto
systems of payola under which programming decisions are influenced by
varied forms of paid consideration and business relationships, rather
than the merits of recordings. In our view, payola of this type has not
abated. We reiterate our view that payments made or consideration provided
to radio stations to influence playlists -- other than legitimate and
reasonable promotional expenses -- must be prohibited, unless such payments
are announced over the air. This includes payments made through independent
radio promoters and considerations like free concerts or other services
provided to radio stations.[3]
Our May 2002 statement focused on independent radio promotion as a disguised
form of payola. We are gratified that, since the release of that statement,
radio station owners Clear Channel and Cox Communications have announced
that they will sever ties with independent radio promoters. However, Clear
Channel's decision to abandon the increasingly controversial practice
of independent radio promotion does little to protect artists and the
public from future forms of payola. To the contrary, a recent press release
by the company suggested that rather than using independent promoters,
Clear Channel will now partner directly with labels to create in house
promotional activities like "group-wide" contests involving
artists.[4] This new promotional strategy does nothing
to address our payola concerns and strikes yet another blow to localism.
Since Clear Channel is a national radio group, their description of "group-wide"
contests implies that they and other consolidated radio chains will very
likely program from a centralized location and focus on artists with group-wide,
i.e., national, appeal at the expense of artists with local appeal. This
practice ignores the FCC principle that individual radio stations in radio
groups are licensed to serve local communities. Furthermore, this practice,
if implemented, will continue to harm local artists, making it nearly
impossible for them to use their local popularity to garner local airtime
and denying even the most successful local artists legitimate access to
a local audience.
We are also worried that other in-kind exchanges may replace independent
promotion and that radio stations will continue to select recordings for
play lists based not on the merits of the recordings but on what the station
“receives” in exchange for playing the song. These in-kind
exchanges are more difficult to track but include a range of possibilities
including artists playing for free or for a reduced rate at concerts promoted
by the radio stations, or playing only at venues owned by the radio station’s
parent company in order to receive a coveted spot on the playlist. These
new partnerships may obscure pay-for-play exchanges and temporarily protect
the radio companies from payola allegations, but they do nothing to protect
the public or insure artists’ access to the public airwaves.
Widespread Radio Ownership Consolidation
A November 2002 study conducted by the Future of Music Coalition
confirmed that radio consolidation has resulted in a loss of localism,
less competition, fewer viewpoints and less diversity in radio programming
in media markets across the country.[5]
We therefore reiterate our request that the FCC investigate the consolidation
of radio ownership in light of the public interests that radio stations
are charged to serve. The FCC must examine how consolidation affects the
choice of music played on the radio, investigate the existence of national
playlists, and clarify the role that consolidation has had on the skyrocketing
costs of radio promotion.
Low Power Radio
Low Power FM stations are community-based, non-commercial
radio stations that operate at 100 watts or less. Adopted by the Federal
Communications Commission in January 2000, the Low Power FM service is
designed to provide broadcasting outlets for local organizations –
churches, schools, community groups, and unions – as an alternative
to the many current centrally-programmed commercial stations that exist
across the country.
Low Power FM stations can provide programming to meet the needs of specific
and underrepresented groups including minorities, religious and linguistic
communities, and can provide a much needed forum for debate about important
local issues. LPFM stations strengthen community identity in urban neighborhoods,
rural towns and other communities that are currently too small to win
much attention from "mainstream," ratings-driven media.
Recording and performing artists, in particular, can benefit greatly by
the creation and expansion of Low Power FM stations, giving them more
outlets for airplay, especially on a local or regional level, or in genres
that are currently under-represented on commercial radio.
In 2000, Congress directed the FCC to hire an outside entity -- the MITRE
Corporation -- to conduct field tests to resolve the issue of Low Power
FM's potential for interference with existing radio stations. In July
2003, the MITRE Study was released and the results concluded that the
interference feared by incumbent broadcasters was not an issue. It will
take congressional action to put Low Power radio back on track for serving
a greater portion of America's cities. As artist advocates, we support
the expansion of Low Power FM stations, and see this service as one of
the antidotes to the effects of media concentration.
Conclusion
As advocates for artists and creators, we remain concerned about the problems that are caused or exacerbated by radio ownership consolidation and vertical integration in the radio industry. Some radio group owners may have severed ties with independent promoters, but other forms of payments and consideration are likely to develop if they are not checked by appropriate oversight and rules. Clear penalties must be established for radio station licensees who attempt to use their leverage to force artists to perform for free, to perform at less than market rates, or to perform in specific venues that are more beneficial for the licensees. Furthermore, we call on Congress to examine whether radio stations are serving the public interest by contributing to localism and independence in broadcasting – an issue that the FCC failed to address in its recent media review – and to ensure that the FCC has regulations in place that will uphold the public interest. Finally, we urge Congress to vote to reauthorize the FCC to relax their overly stringent interference protections and allow Low Power radio stations to be licensed in more densely populated areas.
Respectfully submitted by the following organizations:
American Federation of Musicians (AFM)
American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA)
Artist Empowerment Coalition (AEC)
Association for Independent Music (AFIM)
Future of Music Coalition (FMC)
Just Plain Folks Music Organization (JPF)
Music Managers Forum (MMF)
Nashville Songwriters Association International (NSAI)
National Association of Recording Merchandisers (NARM)
Recording Artists' Coalition (RAC)
Footnotes:
read press release
download as a PDF
Please donate to the cause - PayPal donations welcome at paypal@futureofmusic.org.
home | manifesto
| resources | press
& news | events | FAQs | subscribe | contact
us
 Want to stay on top of music/tech issues? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Read the latest edition online here.
FMC Announces Upcoming Events FMC Seeks Fall/Spring Interns FMC Commends FCC's Comcast Decision Public Enemy Frontman, Production Team and Insiders Discuss Landmark Album FMC Files Brief to Protect Creative Expression FMC Files Reply Comments in FCC Localism Proceeding Wilco, Bright Eyes, Aimee Mann & more "Rock the Net" on Compilation CD Musicians Get the Hint About Health Insurance New York State Music Education Events Examine Crucial Issues Facing Artists Pop Rockers OK Go "Tour" Congress in Support of Net Neutrality New York State Music Education Events Examine Crucial Issues Facing Artists Philly Bands Rocking for Net Neutrality OK Go and Bonerama Rocked DC for New Orleans Musicians Upcoming Washington, DC show and benefit EP from OK Go & Bonerama Successful New Orleans Concerts Aid Big Easy Musicians FMC's Latest Fact Sheets Ann Chaitovitz Appointed Concerts for New Orleans Musicians Bring Artists Together FMC's Jenny Toomey Appointed Program Officer for Ford Foundation Seattle "Rocked the Net" Rock the Net: Campaign for Net Neutrality Rocks Seattle Future of Music Policy Summit to Tackle Critical Issues at the Intersection of Music, Law, Technology and Policy Registration Opens for FMC's Annual Policy Summit FMC files testimony with House Small Business Committee on CRB Webcasting Rates June 21, 2006 Indie-rock revolution, fueled by net neutrality Op-ed by FMC's Jenny Toomey and Michael Bracy June 13, 2006 Pearl Jam Donation To Help Musicians Help Themselves FMC's Michael Bracy Testifies in front
of House Judiciary Committee on "Digital Music Interoperability" |
