A. Location

1. George Washington University was a good location for this type of event.

2. The sound system in Betts Theatre was adequate (easy to hear and see panelists/speakers)

3. The sound system in the 3rd floor rooms was adequate (easy to hear and see panelists/speakers)

B. The Panels [remind yourself about the program here]

1. The panels covered relevant topics

2. The panels were informative

3. The panels were the right length of time (1 hr 15 minutes)

4. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to experience/position/opinions

5. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to gender, race, age, cultural background

1. The moderators were informed

2. The moderators did a good job balancing questions from the audience with questions for the panelists

D. The Keynote Speakers

1. The keynote speakers were informed

2. The keynote speakers talked about important topics

E. Conference Organization/Logistics

1. Registration process was simple

2. FMC website was informative about developing event details

3. Onsite check-in was easy

4. Onsite volunteers/staff were helpful

5. I plan on accessing podcasts/webcasts after event

F. The Big Picture

1. I found this event valuable

2. I thought it was well organized

3. The event addressed important topics

4. Any "big picture" suggestions for next year's Policy Summit? Panelists? Panel Topics? Keynote Speakers?

Information about you

1. My role at the conference was:

2. My current role in the music/tech industry is:

3. I primarly found out about the Summit this way:

OPTIONAL: We hope to post some of the participants' comments about the event on our website or in print materials. If you would like your comments to be considered for inclusion, please give us your name and email address:

name

email