A. Summit Location and Time of Year
1. This is the first time we've taken the Summit outside of
Washington, DC. What, in general, did you think of this move to
Montreal and running this in conjunction with Pop Montreal?
2. This year's Summit was scheduled for early October to run
in conjunction with Pop Montreal. We also know it's Canadian Thanksgiving
and Columbus Day weekend. Is this a convenient time and, if not,
do you have other suggestions?
3. McGill's Schulich School of Music was a good location in
Montreal for this type of event.
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
4. The sound systems in Pollack and Tanna Halls were adequate
(easy to hear and see panelists/speakers)
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
5. Any other thoughts about the location or facilities?
B. The Panels [remind
yourself about the program here ]
1. The panels covered relevant topics
please rate on a scale
of 1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
2. The panels were informative
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. The panels were the right length of time (1 hr 15 minutes)
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
4. What panel topics did we miss? What else should we have covered?
C. The Moderators
1. The moderators were informed
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
2. The moderators did a good job balancing questions
from the audience with questions for the panelists
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. Do you have any suggestions about other moderators
we could approach?
D. The Panelists
1. The panelists were informed
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
2. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to experience/position/opinions
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. There was enough diversity among the panelists
related to gender, race, age, cultural background
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
4. Do you have any suggestions about other panelists we
could approach? We are especially interested in any suggestions that
would make the Summit more diverse.
E. The Keynote Speakers
1. The keynote speakers were informed
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
2. The keynote speakers talked about important topics
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. Do you have any suggestions about other keynote speakers
we could approach?
F. Open ended questions about
the programming
1. This year's program included panels, breakout sessions,
special conversations, keynote speeches and interviews. We also had a Pho
dinner, a breakfast and two cocktail parties. What
did you think about this mixture? Are any of these elements
more compelling than others?
G. Conference Organization/Logistics
1. I registered for the Summit this way
please choose
online
via mail
via fax
online scholarship
via phone
walk-up
no opinion
not applicable
2. I found it easy to register in this way
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. FMC website was informative about developing
Summit details
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
4. Onsite check-in was easy
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
5. Onsite volunteers/staff were helpful
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
H. The Big Picture
1. I found the Policy Summit valuable
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
2. I thought the Policy Summit was well organized
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
3. The Policy Summit addressed important topics
please rate on a scale of
1 to 5
1 = strongly disagree
2 = slightly disagree
3 = neutral
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree
6 = no opinion
7 = not applicable
4. My favorite panel in Pollack or Tanna was:
please choose
State of the Nation
Revenue in the Digital
Age
Orchestras Navigating
Change
Station to Station: Radio
Format Wars:
DRM and Interoperability
New
Deciders: Metafilters, Blogs, Podcasts
Young Musicians
La Boutique Quebecoise
In Perfect
Harmony: Intl Copyright Issues
Could P2P Networks
be Monetized?
Losing Music:
Preservation and Storage
What's Wrong with Music?
International Touring
and Visas
Avatars with
Guitars: Music for Games
Recommendation
Engines and Music Discovery
EDP: Supergroup
Visual
Remix: Sampling in a New Dimension
No favorite
5. My favorite breakout session in A 832 or C 201
was:
please choose
Meet the Mini-Me-Dia
Publishers: New Record
Label?
DIY Online Distribution
State of Independents
How the Money Moves
Policymaking:
How to Make an Impact
don't have a favorite
6. What was your favorite thing about this Summit, and why?
7. Any "big picture" suggestions for next
year's Policy Summit?
8. Where should we hold the next Summit? DC? Montreal?
Somewhere else?
Information about you
1. My role at the conference was:
please choose
panelist
moderator
attendee
musician on scholarship
press
volunteer
sponsor
couldn't attend
2. My current role in the music/tech industry is:
please choose
musician/songwriter
lawyer
tech/internet industry
entertainment industry
financial industry
nonprofit/policy
government institution
economist
academic
student
press
other
3. I primarly found out about the Summit this way:
please choose
I came last year
I was invited by FMC
FMC newsletter
FMC mailer about summit
FMC website
other organization's website
other org's newsletters
blog mention
press previews
Pop Montreal
Posters/flyers in Montreal
Ads in local papers
word of mouth
OPTIONAL: We hope to post some of the participants' comments about the Summit on our website or in print materials.
If you would like your comments to be considered for inclusion, please give us your name and email address:
name
email
Thanks very much for your feedback! Press "submit"
to send it to us.