Future of Music Policy Summit 2004: Program Evaluation

A. The Panels [remind yourself about panels]

1. The panels covered important topics

2. The panels were informative

3. The panels were the right length of time (1 hr 15 minutes)

1. The moderators were informed

2. The moderators did a good job balancing questions from the audience with questions for the panelists

1. The panelists were informed

2. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to experience/position

2. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to gender, race, age

D. Open ended questions about the panels

1. Do you have any other thoughts about the panels, moderators or panels?

2. Do you have any suggestions of panel topics for next year's summit, or panelists we should approach?

E. The Keynote Speakers

1. The keynote speakers were informed

2. The keynote speakers talked about important topics

3. Do you have any suggestions about other keynote speakers we could approach?

F. The Facilities/Catering

1. GWU's Lisner Auditorium is a convenient location in Washington, DC

2. Lisner Auditorium is a good room choice for a summit like this

3. The sound system in Lisner was adequate (easy to hear and see panelists/speakers)

4. Any other thoughts about the facilities or catering?

G. Conference Organization/Logistics

1. This year's Summit was scheduled for the first week of May on a Sunday and Monday. Is this a convenient time and, if not, do you have other suggestions?:

2. I registered for the conference this way:

3. I found it easy to register in this way

4. FMC website was informative about developing summit details

5. Onsite check-in was easy

6. Onsite volunteers/staff were helpful

7. We did not include a continuing legal education (CLE) track this year for a number of reasons, but we would include it again in future events if there's sufficient interest.
If you are a practicing lawyer, would you be willing to pay more to attend the summit in order to earn 7-10 CLE credits?

H. The big picture

1. I found the Policy Summit valuable

2. I thought the Policy Summit was well organized

3. The Policy Summit addressed important topics

4. My favorite panel was:

5. Any other thoughts about this year's Policy Summit?

6. Any "big picture" suggestions about next year's Policy Summit?

Information about you

1. My role at the conference was:

2. My current role in the music/tech industry is:

3. I primarly found out about the Summit this way:

OPTIONAL: We hope to post some of the participants' comments about the Summit on our website or in print materials. If you would like your comments to be considered for inclusion, please give us your name and email address: