Debunked: There Is No "SOPA 2014"

by Communications Associate Kevin Erickson

Hailed as a new step towards a more open, responsive government, The White House’s petition site is in the news again as a key reason for the passage of a bill legalizing cell phone unlocking, signed into law this month. However, as a recent Time Magazine article points out, a handful of popular petitions are still awaiting a White House response despite having surpassed the 100,000 signatures mark, which was supposed to trigger an official reply. Among the petitions crossing this threshold were two that caught our attention: “Stop SOPA 2013” and “Stop SOPA 2014.”

Oddly, the Time article doesn’t mention that the White House already responded thoughtfuly and extensively to a petition about SOPA back in 2012. But much more disconcerting than the lack of official response to the new petitions is the fact that so many people have signed petitions expressing fierce opposition to legislation that they don’t seem to know doesn’t actually exist.

You’ll remember SOPA, or the “Stop Online Piracy Act” was a piece of legislation introduced in 2011. Backed by major entertainment concerns, the bill initially found favor among many in Congress, but after widespread outcry from many corners of the internet, including musicians, the bill died in early 2012.

We were among the many groups that opposed SOPA on the grounds that it was a badly drafted, overreaching and clumsy attempt at dealing with a complicated set of issues that could have had serious unintended side effects for free expression and security online; we were pleased to see it go down.

But since SOPA and the companion bill PIPA died, there have been no attempts to reintroduce similar legislation. None. Zero. Zilch. So what’s with the perennial “return of SOPA” chatter?

Part of it is that any breakout success gets followed by attempts to capitalize on that success; it’s a dynamic that music industry observers are very familiar with. The SOPA protest was so successful that now everyone wants to get a piece of that SOPA magic. Part of it is about how information travels online today; sensational, alarmist headlines about the “return of SOPA” may get a bunch of clickthroughs, Facebook shares, and newsletter signups. But when there’s no actual bill at issue, it can be dishonest, not to mention distracting and dangerous, when there are more serious and immediate threats to the level playing field that the open Internet provides for musicians and music lovers. Consider the 2013 petition language:

In 2012[sic] the Online Privacy Act[sic] was brought fourth[sic] to congress to be passed which would have negatively affected everyone on the internet as a whole. The people fought back and it never happened. Several times now since then it was revised under a different title with changes and tweaks to the wording to again try to get it to pass without the general public knowing about it. Each time it was found out, and then repealed.
Here we are in 2013 and again dealing with a portion of SOPA, this time the streaming of copywritten[sic] works is at the forefront of this particular law to be. If a particular stream contains any copywritten[sic] material of any sort the uploader and creator of said content can be found guilty and automatically placed in prison for years on felony charges.

This petition’s author is obviously confused about a number of things, from the basic mechanics of our legislative and judicial systems (e.g. you can’t repeal a bill that hasn’t been passed; SOPA never even got as far as a floor vote) to the mechanics of copyright (under US law, nearly every original creative work make is copyrighted automatically, so most anything that can be streamed is someone’s copyrighted work.) Beyond that, it appears that they’ve fallen for a wildly inaccurate meme that was spread around last year in response to a USPTO Green paper’s suggestion that the law could treat infringing streaming the same as a download. We debunked this last year: there’s no reason to believe that harmonization of streaming and download infringement penalties would make felons out of YouTube uploaders. In any case, there isn’t actually any bill under consideration, and there hasn’t been since 2011.

Meanwhile, the “Stop SOPA 2014” petition seems even further detached from reality, and we can’t figure out if it’s the result of genuine confusion or just someone’s weird idea of a joke:

“Stop SOPA. SOPA stands for Stop Online Piracy Acts[sic]. In this case, all fanart will be deleted, all fan-pages, fanfics, fan made videos, etc. Please help stop SOPA.”

Yeesh. While it’s good to be vigilant about freedom of expression and fair use, it’s also important to be accurate. A climate of misinformation and cynicism makes it harder for policymakers to make actually helpful reforms that help creators while protecting free speech and creative expression.

Even worse, the constant ringing of false alarms might eventually make it harder to stop any future actually existing problematic legislation, because after awhile, the story becomes “The Boy who cried SOPA.” In the long run, that could seriously threaten internet activists’ ability to be taken seriously.

In the coming days, we’ll be launching a legislative tracker page on our site, so you can keep tabs on any and all current music-related legislation in one place, and understand what each bill does and does not do. For now, when you see online chatter about the “Return of SOPA” online that doesn’t actually refer to any concrete legislation, you might do well to consider it a red flag that your source may not have really done their research, or may not be telling you the full story.

And next year, when you see someone sharing a “Stop SOPA 2015” petition on Facebook claiming that the government wants to delete all the curse words from your MP3s, send you to prison for singing “Happy Birthday” to your grandma over Skype, and give the MPAA control of your Instagram account, well…maybe check with us before signing it.

Foil hat image via Shutterstock.

Submitted by kevin on August 28, 2014 - 3:41pm

Comments

3 comments posted

Thanks so much! I saw this

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 16, 2014 - 10:02pm.

Thanks so much! I saw this all over the interblag and I had a hard time believing it.

The guy who wrote this

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 8, 2014 - 1:35pm.

The guy who wrote this clearly has no idea what he is doing, and hasn't looked into the topic at all.

Thanks for reading! :)

Submitted by kevin on December 14, 2014 - 9:47pm.

Thanks for reading! :)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.